I posted this note today on FB – the wiki definition for pansexuality –
“Pansexuality, or omnisexuality[1] is a sexual orientation, characterized by the potential for aesthetic attraction, romantic love, or sexual desire towards people, regardless of their gender identity or biological sex. Some pansexuals suggest that they are gender-blind; that gender and sex are insignificant or irrelevant in determining whether they will be sexually attracted to others.[2] For others, an individual’s sex, gender expression, or gender identity can be a key factor of attraction, despite the pansexual individual’s wide range of sex and gender attractions.”
My immediate thought was, like a friend’s comment, was that actually the definition sounded what I thought was a definition for bisexuality. I just can’t grasp this idea that pansexual people are attracted to others regardless of their gender. What does this actually mean? That somehow pansexual people do not have pre-conceived notions of conventional gender identities? That they do not have a concept of man or woman or other, as the case may be? Or does it mean that pansexuals simply do not recognise that gender has an identity at all?
And the more I thought about it and tried to explain to a friend what/who I am attracted to, as a lesbian (which, to clarify, is defined as a woman who is attracted to other women and prefers, at least most of the time, to have sex with women) the more I found myself tangled up in the binary language of our world, not least the language of sexuality. Like, I said, I like women who are, you know, women. What does that mean? Well, I like feminine women. Ay! I fell into the first trap. Ok, but I also like women who are in control and independent, women who defy the conventional attributes of their gender. Ay! Second pitfall. I thought, well, as a lesbian I have both male and female traits, that’s what makes me a lesbian and that’s what I like in others! Ayyyyyy! Third banana peel.
Gender identity and sexual preference, we have all been learning about this year, are totally different things.And all these compartmentalising labels and sub-sections are starting to drive me crazy.
Based on the above I’m not even sure if I can identify my gender identity or sexuality without being accused of being closed-minded and conventional, worse still, simply wrong. Ugh. I always thought I was on the fringe, alternative, edgy and well, liberal. Never has being a lesbian identified woman ever been so not alternative and so not cool.
If I try again to describe the kind of person I like without falling into a political minefield of correctness, I’d say – I like people with big brains, a great sense of humour and real pussy and real breasts. Oops, now that wasn’t very PC after all. OK OK OK so that was a little crude. But I guess my point is that regardless of how I describe what attracts me and in what terms, I would not at all, pit those requirements against a man, identified male or otherwise. Alas I guess that either confirms how shallow and close-minded I am or that I am truly a lesbian and not a pansexual lesbian.
Share on Facebook